Politics and Prosperity

“Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure.”

Menu

Skip to content

Estimating the Rahn Curve: A Sequel

Posted on January 24, 2012 by Loquitur Veritatem

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Skype

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

This entry was posted in Economics: Principles and Issues. Bookmark the permalink.

Post navigation

← Another Entry in the Sunstein Saga
In Defense of the 1% →

Loquitur Veritatem

My pen name, Loquitur Veritatem, means truth-teller.

Search this site

Archives

Feature pages

  • Favorite Posts

Recent articles

  • Looking for Something? November 2, 2022
  • Politics & Prosperity Revisited July 5, 2022
  • One More Thing June 15, 2022
  • Finito May 15, 2022
  • Why Freedom of Speech? May 10, 2022
  • The Meaning of the War in Ukraine May 8, 2022
  • Theodore Dalrymple Speaks for Me May 6, 2022
  • Coronavirus Update: The Control Freaks in the U.S. (and Elsewhere) Blew It April 23, 2022
  • Where Are the “Better Angels” Now? March 15, 2022
  • Ukraine: Who’s to Blame? March 14, 2022
  • CO2 Fail (Revisited) March 10, 2022
  • Am I Back? March 2, 2022
  • Thoughts for the Day March 2, 2022
  • November 22, 1963 November 22, 2021
  • Critical Race Theory: Where It Really Leads November 20, 2021
  • The Iron Law of Change November 17, 2021
  • A National Divorce Is the Only Solution November 16, 2021
  • What Would Jimmy Durante Do? November 15, 2021
  • Don’t Celebrate Yet Virginia November 8, 2021
  • What Happened to America? November 6, 2021

Most Read

  • What Do Wokesters Want?

Categories

  • Academic Freedom – Civil Liberties – Privacy (165)
  • Affirmative Action – Immigration – Race (152)
  • Baseball and Lesser Sports (124)
  • Blogs – Bloggers – Blogging (90)
  • Climate Change and Environmentalism (89)
  • Constitution – Courts – Law – Justice (648)
  • Culture – Language – The Arts (376)
  • Economics: Principles and Issues (742)
  • Election 2016 (8)
  • Election 2020 (25)
  • Electoral Politics (237)
  • Enemies: Foreign and Domestic (206)
  • Entertainment (7)
  • Health and Health Care (35)
  • History (125)
  • Humor – Satire – Wry Commentary (116)
  • Intelligence – Personality – Psychology (226)
  • Leftism – Statism – Democracy (672)
  • Liberty – Libertarianism – Rights (441)
  • Logic (6)
  • Management (33)
  • Media Matters & Reportage (135)
  • Nature (4)
  • Nostalgia – Trivia – Popular Culture (110)
  • Philosophy – Religion – Science – Pseudoscience (210)
  • Political Economy & Civil Society (395)
  • Political Movements & Theories (225)
  • Politics (1)
  • Politics – Politicians – Government in Action (568)
  • Public Education and Homeschooling (24)
  • Science and Understanding (287)
  • Self Ownership: Abortion – Euthanasia – Gender – Etc. (107)
  • Social Commentary (40)
  • Technology (4)
  • Thinkers: Famous and Infamous (184)
  • Trivia (11)
  • Uncategorized (28)
  • War – Peace – Foreign Affairs (442)

Most-Used Tags

abortion AGW altruism atheism Austin baseball civil society climate change conservatism Constitution coronavirus COVID-19 creation crime defense democracy Donald Trump economic growth economics Election 2016 Election 2020 existence fascism freedom of speech GDP GDP growth global warming God Golden Rule government spending Great Recession Hillary Clinton income inequality intelligence Keynesianism leftism leftists liberalism libertarianism libertarian paternalism liberty morality natural rights negative rights Obama Obamacare paternalism polarization political correctness Politics preemptive war probability progressivism pseudo-libertarianism psychology race race and intelligence racism Rahn Curve real unemployment rate redistribution regulation same-sex marriage science secession social justice social norms social welfare society statism Supreme Court Trump unemployment utilitarianism welfare state

On Liberty and Libertarianism

What is liberty? It is peaceful, willing coexistence and its concomitant: beneficially cooperative behavior.

John Stuart Mill opined that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." But who determines whether an act is harmful or harmless? Acts deemed harmless by an individual are not harmless if they subvert the societal bonds of trust and self-restraint upon which liberty itself depends.

Which is not to say that all social regimes are regimes of liberty. Liberty requires voice -- the freedom to dissent -- and exit -- the freedom to choose one's neighbors and associates. Voice and exit depend, in turn, on the rule of law under a minimal state.

Liberty, because it is a social phenomenon and not an innate condition of humanity, must be won and preserved by an unflinching defense of a polity that fosters liberty through its norms, and the swift and certain administration of justice within that polity. The governments in and of the United States have long since ceased to foster liberty, but most Americans are captives in their own land and have no choice but to strive for the restoration of liberty, or something closer to it.

Who can restore liberty? Certainly not the self-proclaimed libertarians who are fixated on Mill's empty harm principle and align with the left on social norms. Traditional (i.e., Burkean) conservatism fosters the preservation and adherence of beneficial norms (e.g., the last six of the Ten Commandments). Thus, by necessity, the only true libertarianism is found in traditional conservatism. I am a traditional conservative, which makes me a libertarian -- a true one.

Notes about Usage

“State” (with a capital “S”) refers to one of the United States, and “States” refers to two or more of them. “State” and “States,” thus used, are proper nouns because they refer to a unique entity or entities: one or more of the United States, the union of which, under the terms and conditions stated in the Constitution, is the raison d’être for the nation. I reserve the uncapitalized word “state” for a government, or hierarchy of them, which exerts a monopoly of force within its boundaries.

Marriage, in the Western tradition, predates the state and legitimates the union of one man and one woman. As such, it is an institution that is vital to civil society and therefore to the enjoyment of liberty. The recognition of a more-or-less permanent homosexual pairing as a kind of marriage is both ill-advised and illegitimate. Such an arrangement is therefore a “marriage” (in quotation marks) or, more accurately, a homosexual cohabitation contract (HCC).

The words “liberal”, “progressive”, and their variants are usually enclosed in quotation marks (sneer quotes) because they refer to persons and movements whose statist policies are, in fact, destructive of liberty and progress. I sometimes italicize the words, just to reduce visual clutter.

I have reverted to the British style of punctuating in-line quotations, which I followed 40 years ago when I published a weekly newspaper. The British style is to enclose within quotation marks only (a) the punctuation that appears in quoted text or (b) the title of a work (e.g., a blog post) that is usually placed within quotation marks.

I have reverted because of the confusion and unsightliness caused by the American style. It calls for the placement of periods and commas within quotation marks, even if the periods and commas don’t occur in the quoted material or title. Also, if there is a question mark at the end of quoted material, it replaces the comma or period that might otherwise be placed there.

If I had continued to follow American style, I would have ended a sentence in a recent post with this:

… “A New (Cold) Civil War or Secession?” “The Culture War,” “Polarization and De-facto Partition,” and “Civil War?“

What a hodge-podge. There’s no comma between the first two entries, and the sentence ends with an inappropriate question mark. With two titles ending in question marks, there was no way for me to avoid a series in which a comma is lacking. I could have avoided the sentence-ending question mark by recasting the list, but the items are listed chronologically, which is how they should be read.

I solved these problems easily by reverting to the British style:

… “A New (Cold) Civil War or Secession?”, “The Culture War“, “Polarization and De-facto Partition“, and “Civil War?“.

This not only eliminates the hodge-podge, but is also more logical and accurate. All items are separated by commas, commas aren’t displaced by question marks, and the declarative sentence ends with a period instead of a question mark.

For much more see “Writing: A Guide“.

  • Follow Following
    • Politics and Prosperity
    • Join 88 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Politics and Prosperity
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: