Politics and Prosperity

Seeing the world clearly

Menu

Skip to content

The States and the Constitution

Posted on September 6, 2014 by Loquitur Veritatem

See “The Constitution: Myths and Realities“.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • Telegram
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Skype

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

This entry was posted in Constitution - Courts - Law - Justice and tagged Constitution, We the People. Bookmark the permalink.

Post navigation

← Election 2014: E-Day Minus 60
Evolution, Culture, and “Diversity” →

Loquitur Veritatem

My pen name, Loquitur Veritatem, means truth-teller.

Search this site

“Trump Re-election Watch” as of 12/03/19 – Click image for explanation

Feature pages

  • Abortion Q & A
  • About
    • My Moral Profile
  • Climate Change
  • Constitution for the 21st Century
  • Constitution: Myths and Realities
  • Economic Growth Since World War II
  • Economics: A Survey
  • Einstein’s Errors
  • Favorite Posts
  • Freespace and Me
  • Intelligence
  • Keynesian Multiplier: Fiction vs. Fact
  • Leftism
    • Leftism: A Bibliography
  • Modeling and Science
  • Monarchs of England
  • Movies
  • Political Ideologies
  • Presidents: Key Dates and Various Trivia
  • Social Norms and Liberty
  • Spygate (a.k.a Russiagate)
  • The British Roots of the Founding, and of Liberty in America
  • U.S. Supreme Court: Lines of Succession and Ideological Alignment
  • Writing: A Guide

Recent articles

  • “Solomon” Horowitz Cuts the Baby in Half December 9, 2019
  • Not-So-Random Thoughts (XXV) December 9, 2019
  • Dangerous Millennials? December 8, 2019
  • Good News from the Federal Government December 6, 2019
  • Can Libertarianism and Conservatism Be Reconciled? A Footnote December 5, 2019
  • The Ukraine Controversy and Trump’s Popularity December 5, 2019
  • The Trump Disadvantage December 4, 2019
  • Trump Re-election Watch December 3, 2019
  • White Privilege November 29, 2019
  • Why Is Capitalism Under Attack from the Right? November 29, 2019
  • Leftism in Summary November 28, 2019
  • Can Libertarianism and Conservatism Be Reconciled? November 27, 2019
  • “Human Nature” by David Berlinski: A Revew November 22, 2019
  • The Allure of Leftism November 22, 2019
  • The Democrats’ Master Plan to Seize America November 20, 2019
  • “Hurricane Hysteria” and “Climate Hysteria”, Updated November 19, 2019
  • One Kind of Deep-Stater November 18, 2019
  • The Shallowness of Secular Ethical Systems November 15, 2019
  • Society, Culture, and America’s Future November 9, 2019
  • Gillette and Me November 8, 2019

Most Read

  • Not-So-Random Thoughts (XXV)
  • "Solomon" Horowitz Cuts the Baby in Half
  • Not-So-Random Thoughts (XXIV)
  • Can Libertarianism and Conservatism Be Reconciled? A Footnote
  • The Trump Disadvantage
  • Trump Re-election Watch
  • Pseudoscience, "Moneyball," and Luck
  • Inventing "Liberalism"
  • Libertarian Conservative or Conservative Libertarian?
  • Life in Austin (2)

Blogroll

  • American Spectator, The
  • American Thinker
  • Americana, Etc.
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • askblog (Arnold Kling)
  • bluebird of bitterness
  • City Journal
  • Climate Etc.
  • College Fix, The
  • Conversible Economist
  • Daily Signal, The (Heritage Foundation)
  • Dalrymple, Theodore (at Taki'sl Magazine)
  • Dissecting Leftism (John J. Ray)
  • Dyspepsia Generation
  • EconLog
  • Federalist, The
  • Greenie Watch (John J. Ray)
  • Hanson, Victor Davis
  • Imlac's Journal
  • Law and Liberty
  • Le*gal In*sur*rec*tion
  • Liberty Corner
  • Liberty Corner, The Original
  • Maverick Philosopher (Bill Vallicella)
  • Motus Mentis
  • Originalism Blog, The
  • Political Calculations
  • Political Correctness Watch (John J. Ray)
  • Public Discourse
  • Quillette
  • Right Coast, The
  • SCOTUSblog
  • Spencer, Roy (Ph.D.)
  • Thompson, James (at The Unz Review)
  • Volokh Conspiracy, The
  • Watts Up With That?
  • West Hunter

Archives

Categories

  • Academic Freedom – Civil Liberties – Privacy (163)
  • Affirmative Action – Immigration – Race (144)
  • Baseball and Lesser Sports (124)
  • Blogs – Bloggers – Blogging (83)
  • Climate Change and Environmentalism (75)
  • Constitution – Courts – Law – Justice (619)
  • Culture – Language – The Arts (363)
  • Economics: Principles and Issues (704)
  • election 2016 (6)
  • Electoral Politics (197)
  • Enemies: Foreign and Domestic (179)
  • Entertainment (5)
  • Health and Health Care (21)
  • History (114)
  • Humor – Satire – Wry Commentary (108)
  • Intelligence – Personality – Psychology (205)
  • Leftism – Statism – Democracy (617)
  • Liberty – Libertarianism – Rights (415)
  • Logic (5)
  • Management (31)
  • Media Matters & Reportage (125)
  • Nature (4)
  • Nostalgia – Trivia – Popular Culture (104)
  • Philosophy – Religion – Science – Pseudoscience (195)
  • Political Economy & Civil Society (384)
  • Political Movements & Theories (201)
  • politics (27)
  • Politics – Politicians – Government in Action (494)
  • Public Education and Homeschooling (23)
  • Science and Understanding (236)
  • Self Ownership: Abortion – Euthanasia – Gender – Etc. (104)
  • Social Commentary (35)
  • Technology (4)
  • Thinkers: Famous and Infamous (182)
  • Trivia (10)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • War – Peace – Foreign Affairs (422)

Most-Used Tags

abortion AGW altruism atheism Austin baseball civil society climate change conservatism Constitution creation crime defense democracy Donald Trump economic growth economics economic stagnation election 2014 election 2016 fascism freedom of speech GDP GDP growth global warming God Golden Rule government spending Great Recession Hillary Clinton income inequality intelligence Keynesianism leftism leftists liberalism libertarianism libertarian paternalism liberty morality natural rights negative rights Nirvana fallacy Obama Obamacare paternalism political correctness politics preemptive war probability progressivism pseudo-libertarianism psychology race race and intelligence racism Rahn Curve real unemployment rate redistribution regulation same-sex marriage science secession social justice social norms Social Security social welfare society statism Supreme Court terrorism Trump unemployment utilitarianism welfare state

Comments & Correspondence

Now that this blog is in hiatus, I have closed comments on all posts. If you wish to communicate privately, you may e-mail me at the Germanic nickname for Friedrich followed by the last name of the great Austrian economist and Nobel laureate whose first name is Friedrich followed by the 3rd and 4th digits of his birth year followed by the usual typographic symbol followed by the domain and extension for Google’s e-mail service — all run together.

On Liberty and Libertarianism

What is liberty? It is peaceful, willing coexistence and its concomitant: beneficially cooperative behavior.

John Stuart Mill opined that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." But who determines whether an act is harmful or harmless? Acts deemed harmless by an individual are not harmless if they subvert the societal bonds of trust and self-restraint upon which liberty itself depends.

Which is not to say that all social regimes are regimes of liberty. Liberty requires voice -- the freedom to dissent -- and exit -- the freedom to choose one's neighbors and associates. Voice and exit depend, in turn, on the rule of law under a minimal state.

Liberty, because it is a social phenomenon and not an innate condition of humanity, must be won and preserved by an unflinching defense of a polity that fosters liberty through its norms, and the swift and certain administration of justice within that polity. The governments in and of the United States have long since ceased to foster liberty, but most Americans are captives in their own land and have no choice but to strive for the restoration of liberty, or something closer to it.

Who can restore liberty? Certainly not the self-proclaimed libertarians who are fixated on Mill's empty harm principle and align with the left on social norms. Traditional (i.e., Burkean) conservatism fosters the preservation and adherence of beneficial norms (e.g., the last six of the Ten Commandments). Thus, by necessity, the only true libertarianism is found in traditional conservatism. I am a traditional conservative, which makes me a libertarian -- a true one.

Notes about Usage

“State” (with a capital “S”) refers to one of the United States, and “States” refers to two or more of them. “State” and “States,” thus used, are proper nouns because they refer to a unique entity or entities: one or more of the United States, the union of which, under the terms and conditions stated in the Constitution, is the raison d’être for the nation. I reserve the uncapitalized word “state” for a government, or hierarchy of them, which exerts a monopoly of force within its boundaries.

Marriage, in the Western tradition, predates the state and legitimates the union of one man and one woman. As such, it is an institution that is vital to civil society and therefore to the enjoyment of liberty. The recognition of a more-or-less permanent homosexual pairing as a kind of marriage is both ill-advised and illegitimate. Such an arrangement is therefore a “marriage” (in quotation marks) or, more accurately, a homosexual cohabitation contract (HCC).

The words “liberal”, “progressive”, and their variants are usually enclosed in quotation marks (sneer quotes) because they refer to persons and movements whose statist policies are, in fact, destructive of liberty and progress. I sometimes italicize the words, just to reduce visual clutter.

I have reverted to the British style of punctuating in-line quotations, which I followed 40 years ago when I published a weekly newspaper. The British style is to enclose within quotation marks only (a) the punctuation that appears in quoted text or (b) the title of a work (e.g., a blog post) that is usually placed within quotation marks.

I have reverted because of the confusion and unsightliness caused by the American style. It calls for the placement of periods and commas within quotation marks, even if the periods and commas don’t occur in the quoted material or title. Also, if there is a question mark at the end of quoted material, it replaces the comma or period that might otherwise be placed there.

If I had continued to follow American style, I would have ended a sentence in a recent post with this:

… “A New (Cold) Civil War or Secession?” “The Culture War,” “Polarization and De-facto Partition,” and “Civil War?“

What a hodge-podge. There’s no comma between the first two entries, and the sentence ends with an inappropriate question mark. With two titles ending in question marks, there was no way for me to avoid a series in which a comma is lacking. I could have avoided the sentence-ending question mark by recasting the list, but the items are listed chronologically, which is how they should be read.

I solved these problems easily by reverting to the British style:

… “A New (Cold) Civil War or Secession?”, “The Culture War“, “Polarization and De-facto Partition“, and “Civil War?“.

This not only eliminates the hodge-podge, but is also more logical and accurate. All items are separated by commas, commas aren’t displaced by question marks, and the declarative sentence ends with a period instead of a question mark.

For much more see “Writing: A Guide“.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: